[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aN1JtqM0KcMuaI9y@pie>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 15:33:10 +0000
From: Yao Zi <ziyao@...root.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Celeste Liu <uwu@...lacanthus.name>
Subject: Re: Running os-test on musl's POSIX headers
On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 02:41:01PM +0000, Yao Zi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Jonas 'Sortie' Termansen wrote:
> > Hi musl,
> >
> > You might be interested in the os-test project I've been building
> > lately. The new include test suite checks whether the standard library
> > headers declare everything that POSIX.1-2024 requires, sliced by each
> > option group:
> >
> > https://sortix.org/os-test/include/ for the raw data
> > https://sortix.org/blog/os-testing-posix-headers/ for a write-up about
> > the results
>
> Nice work! But when I forwarded the link to my friends, she pointed out
> there're some problems in the Linux (glibc) section of the blog.
> Precisely saying, about struct flock's definition, it's described as
>
> struct flock {
> /* ... */
> int l_whence;
> int l_type;
> };
>
> However, glibc does define flock.l_{whence,type} as int[1] on Linux,
~~~
I was meant to refer to "short int" here, sorry for the typo.
> and passed the corresponding test! It's actually glibc on Hurd[2]
> failing to do so.
Thanks,
Yao Zi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
