![]() |
|
Message-ID: <634e4629-2bf7-02cb-42d3-ea9e1ba52ce5@evolvis.org> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 01:54:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@...lvis.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com cc: Sertonix <sertonix@...teo.net> Subject: Re: unreliable/unused mbstowcs check in is_valid_hostname On Tue, 2 Sep 2025, Rich Felker wrote: >In any case, I don't think any of this matters until we get to really >doing IDN. The code isn't doing anything right now, but changing it >based on expectations of how IDN will later work without actually >having worked that out seems like pointless churn. The length check for 255 max shouldn’t hurt though? (Except, it should actually be 254, not including a possible trailing dot, which isn’t allowed in the FQDN RFC anyway.) bye, //mirabilos -- 22:20⎜<asarch> The crazy that persists in his craziness becomes a master 22:21⎜<asarch> And the distance between the craziness and geniality is only measured by the success 18:35⎜<asarch> "Psychotics are consistently inconsistent. The essence of sanity is to be inconsistently inconsistent
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.