[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a53fd2e-2686-8a86-92d3-44c5e2ac20e5@esi.com.au>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 12:05:51 +1000 (AEST)
From: Damian McGuckin <damianm@....com.au>
To: MUSL <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Should asinf(x) raise underflow for subnormal 'x'
Hi Rich,
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025, Rich Felker wrote:
> Sounds right. I'd welcome a fix for this.
Not right now. I am a bit swamped with paperwork and administration stuff
for now. I noticed this in a code review of work done in another language
and another way. I always cross reference MUSL as I treat it a bit like
the gold standard for such libraries. I can work on it when some of the
others in my team get back from hoilidays late next month and take some of
my load off. If it is needed earlier, somebody else will need to attack
it. I am not a user of the FORCE_EVAL()) macro or the other techniques
like __math_uflow() to achieve that exception so I need to check how they
are used so I follow the same style.
> I think the double and ld versions might be affected too.
They are.
Thanks - Damian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
