[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA2zVHpDc1wzfcrGWmbvBoCfLfpEC_wBtoUWdRx19cpHA=kGsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 16:50:01 -0400
From: James Y Knight <jyknight@...gle.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: "A. Wilcox" <AWilcox@...cox-tech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] string.h: Unconditionally expose C23 functions
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 2:55 PM Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de> wrote:
> I’d ask to at least
> consider it a little longer given you have actual user reports
> that they have to patch out things like this downstream.
Do you have examples of what, concretely, was broken and required the
patch? The commit message for the change that ifdef'd away aligned_alloc,
at_quick_exit, and quick_exit provides no info about why you found it
important to patch downstream -- only that you did so.
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
