|
|
Message-ID: <143bd136-bcda-988a-3cc8-e7740cbc3063@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 16:18:42 +0000 (UTC)
From: Joseph Myers <josmyers@...hat.com>
To: Mark Harris <mark.hsj@...il.com>
cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx@...nel.org>, Eric Blake <eblake@...hat.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, enh <enh@...gle.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org>,
musl@...ts.openwall.com, libc-alpha@...rceware.org,
наб <nabijaczleweli@...ijaczleweli.xyz>,
Paul Eggert <eggert@...ucla.edu>, Robert Seacord <rcseacord@...il.com>,
Bruno Haible <bruno@...sp.org>, bug-gnulib@....org,
JeanHeyd Meneide <phdofthehouse@...il.com>, Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de>
Subject: Re: Re: BUG: realloc(p,0) should be consistent with
malloc(0)
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025, Mark Harris wrote:
> There were three editions of POSIX prior to POSIX.1-2001:
Also the Trial-Use 1986 edition. (Appendix D, Comparison with Related
Systems, marks realloc with "**", where "Functions marked ** are
considered to be included in this standard by reference to the C
Information Bulletin July 1985 or subsequent standard for the C
programming language.)
--
Joseph S. Myers
josmyers@...hat.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.