![]() |
|
Message-ID: <143bd136-bcda-988a-3cc8-e7740cbc3063@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 16:18:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Joseph Myers <josmyers@...hat.com> To: Mark Harris <mark.hsj@...il.com> cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx@...nel.org>, Eric Blake <eblake@...hat.com>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, enh <enh@...gle.com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>, Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org>, musl@...ts.openwall.com, libc-alpha@...rceware.org, наб <nabijaczleweli@...ijaczleweli.xyz>, Paul Eggert <eggert@...ucla.edu>, Robert Seacord <rcseacord@...il.com>, Bruno Haible <bruno@...sp.org>, bug-gnulib@....org, JeanHeyd Meneide <phdofthehouse@...il.com>, Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de> Subject: Re: Re: BUG: realloc(p,0) should be consistent with malloc(0) On Fri, 20 Jun 2025, Mark Harris wrote: > There were three editions of POSIX prior to POSIX.1-2001: Also the Trial-Use 1986 edition. (Appendix D, Comparison with Related Systems, marks realloc with "**", where "Functions marked ** are considered to be included in this standard by reference to the C Information Bulletin July 1985 or subsequent standard for the C programming language.) -- Joseph S. Myers josmyers@...hat.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.