[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6a511ad-9a0a-42b4-aa73-8069fbfadf28@mirbsd.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 17:37:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx@...nel.org>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org>,
libc-alpha@...rceware.org, Joseph Myers <josmyers@...hat.com>,
наб <nabijaczleweli@...ijaczleweli.xyz>,
Paul Eggert <eggert@...ucla.edu>, Robert Seacord <rcseacord@...il.com>,
Bruno Haible <bruno@...sp.org>, bug-gnulib@....org,
JeanHeyd Meneide <phdofthehouse@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Re: BUG: realloc(p,0) should be consistent with
malloc(0)
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025, enh wrote:
>not when POSIX screwed up and made a change that made most of the
>existing implementations non-conformant, no. that sounds like a POSIX
“most of”?
Looks to me like most implementations already do the latter,
and some might do the former, and only a minority (the three
mentioned earlier) don’t.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as
seconds since the Epoch precisely represent the number of
seconds between the referenced time and the Epoch.”
-- IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993 (POSIX) Section B.2.2.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
