![]() |
|
Message-ID: <df04e77e-3f66-11fc-9aee-7bfd006ddf76@evolvis.org> Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2025 21:34:46 +0200 (CEST) From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@...lvis.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com cc: Bobby Bingham <koorogi@...rogi.info> Subject: Re: The `sigpause` function behavior does not fully comply with the POSIX specification On Sun, 8 Jun 2025, Rich Felker wrote: >This would probably call for an interpretation, except that the >functions were removed from the standard and the standard no longer >has anything to say about them. So I'm not sure what's best to do. Ask for an interpretation for Issue 7. I also read this as “in the success case, but there may be other errors”. The other errors of course exist and you need to handle them as usual cases pop up every once in a while for us shell developers… bye, //mirabilos -- FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much *much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.