![]() |
|
Message-ID: <ec1f19c3-c2af-1391-2638-77e8375bcc69@evolvis.org> Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 19:14:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@...lvis.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Deadlock in dynamic linker? On Tue, 27 May 2025, Markus Wichmann wrote: >But __libc_exit_fini() refuses to destroy libraries that haven't been >constructed completely. If p->constructed is zero, a node is skipped Isn’t that the *good* thing? >By adding nodes to the fini list only when construction has finished, we >would also get rid of the need to have __libc_exit_fini() wait for >construction to finish first. AIUI that may change the order which is inacceptable? bye, //mirabilos -- 15:41⎜<Lo-lan-do:#fusionforge> Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.