|
Message-ID: <CAAvnz_q9v1ZXhNJ3ofu-F2TC_rqiPOvSif67mK-cj9fYO0NLpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 14:39:35 +0800
From: Howard Su <howard0su@...il.com>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de>, musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [Suggestion] Add cfi directives to assembly code via chatgpt
fair enough. Let's put aside that LLM writing the CFI directives. I do have
knowledge about it to hand write it.
Do you think it is a good idea to put effort into adding CFI to those
assembly code, especially the thread_cp part, which blocks my debug.
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 5:40 AM Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 02:18:11PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > Howard Su dixit:
> >
> > >I tried ChatGPT which is able to write cfi directives correctly.
> >
> > It is not. It is also a destroyer of the environment and a theft machine
> > and while I’m not sure musl has such a policy, many OSS projects won’t
> > permit use of ML/LLM (so-called “AI”) when creating a contribution.
>
> Indeed, while in this case I would guess the amount of code (I have
> not read it because I don't want copyright taint) is sufficiently
> small and non-creative not to be subject to copyright, in general,
> anything output from an LLM (chatgpt or otherwise) is not acceptable
> for inclusion in musl because it is plagiarized from some unknown and
> undiscoverable subset of billions(?) of works incorporated into the
> LLM without authorization by their authors/copyright holders. Anything
> submitted for inclusion must have provenance (original authorship or
> exiting published material under suitable license) whereby we know it
> can be copied and distributed under the project license.
>
> Rich
>
--
-Howard
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.