Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:49:20 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <>
To: "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <>,
 "Arnd Bergmann" <>, Linux-Arch <>,
Cc: "Rich Felker" <>, "Andreas Larsson" <>,
 guoren <>,
 "" <>,
 "H. Peter Anvin" <>,,,,
 "Helge Deller" <>,,
 "Christophe Leroy" <>,
 "Naveen N. Rao" <>,
 "Heiko Carstens" <>,
 "" <>,
 "Nicholas Piggin" <>,
 "Alexander Viro" <>,
 "LTP List" <>, "Brian Cain" <>,
 "Christian Brauner" <>,
 "Thomas Bogendoerfer" <>,
 "Xi Ruoyao" <>,,,,,,
 "David S . Miller" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] sh: rework sync_file_range ABI

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024, at 08:14, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 11:41 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, at 10:44, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> > Did you also check what order libc uses? I would expect libc on SuperH 
>> > misordering the
>> > arguments as well unless I am missing something. Or do we know that the 
>> > code is actually
>> > currently broken?
>> Yes, I checked glibc, musl and uclibc-ng for all the cases in
>> which the ABI made no sense, as well as to check that my analysis
>> of the kernel sources matches the expectations of the libc.
> OK, awesome.
> Will you send a v2 so I can ack the updated version of the patch?
> I'm also fine with the patch going through your tree, as I would
> like to start with the changes for v6.11 this week.

I should be able to get a v2 out today and apply that to my
asm-generic tree to have in linux-next before I send the
pull request.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.