Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 18:28:58 +0200
From: Helge Deller <>
To: Arnd Bergmann <>,
 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <>,
 Arnd Bergmann <>, Linux-Arch <>,
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <>,,,
 "David S . Miller" <>,
 Andreas Larsson <>,,
 Michael Ellerman <>, Nicholas Piggin <>,
 Christophe Leroy <>,
 "Naveen N. Rao" <>,,
 Brian Cain <>,,
 guoren <>,
 "" <>,
 Heiko Carstens <>,,
 Rich Felker <>,,
 "H. Peter Anvin" <>, Alexander Viro <>,
 Christian Brauner <>,,
 Xi Ruoyao <>,
 "" <>,
 LTP List <>,
 Adhemerval Zanella Netto <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] parisc: use generic sys_fanotify_mark

On 6/21/24 11:52, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, at 11:03, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 10:56 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> Feel free to pick up the sh patch directly, I'll just merge whatever
>>> is left in the end. I mainly want to ensure we can get all the bugfixes
>>> done for v6.10 so I can build my longer cleanup series on top of it
>>> for 6.11.
>> This series is still for 6.10?
> Yes, these are all the bugfixes that I think we want to backport
> to stable kernels, so it makes sense to merge them as quickly as
> possible. The actual stuff I'm working on will come as soon as
> I have it in a state for public review and won't need to be
> backported.

Ah, OK.... in that case would you please keep the two parisc
patches in your git tree? I didn't plan to send a new pull
request during v6.10, so it's easier for me if you keep them
and send them together with your other remaining patches.
(I'll drop them now from the parisc tree)

I tested both patches, so you may add:
Tested-by: Helge Deller <>
Acked-by: Helge Deller <>

Thank you!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.