[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 10:41:29 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: Jₑₙₛ Gustedt <jens.gustedt@...ia.fr>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [C23 128 bit 4/4] C23: implement proper support for
int128_t and uint128_t
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 04:36:43PM +0200, Jₑₙₛ Gustedt wrote:
> Rich,
>
> on Wed, 31 May 2023 10:27:44 -0400 you (Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>)
> wrote:
>
> > Unless the rules in C23 changed,
>
> They did change, this is what this is all about.
Can you cite that? Because I don't see it. I still see that intmax_t
has to be at least as wide as all the intN_t. And AIUI this is the
whole reason _BitInt was added -- to give implementations the freedom
to add types larger than intmax_t.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
