Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 10:44:56 -0800 From: enh <enh@...gle.com> To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: SA_RESTORER for rv64? oops, never actually sent the patch. attached... On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 9:31 AM Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 9:19 AM Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 07:44:23AM -0800, enh wrote: > > > arch/riscv64/bits/signal.h has contained a definition for SA_RESTORER since > > > the initial commit, but i think that's just copy & paste from whichever > > > architecture the rv64 headers were based on? the linux kernel itself > > > doesn't have SA_RESTORER for rv64, unless i'm missing something? > > > > I suspect this is just a mistake. Have you seen any ill effects from > > it? If riscv folks can confirm it's wrong, I'll remove it. > > Yeah I think it should be removed. Perhaps mips is in same boat. > > > > > Rich View attachment "0001-risc-v-does-not-have-SA_RESTORER.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (795 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.