Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:26:47 -0800
From: enh <>
Subject: Re: SA_RESTORER for rv64?

On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 9:19 AM Rich Felker <> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 07:44:23AM -0800, enh wrote:
> > arch/riscv64/bits/signal.h has contained a definition for SA_RESTORER
> since
> > the initial commit, but i think that's just copy & paste from whichever
> > architecture the rv64 headers were based on? the linux kernel itself
> > doesn't have SA_RESTORER for rv64, unless i'm missing something?
> I suspect this is just a mistake. Have you seen any ill effects from
> it? If riscv folks can confirm it's wrong, I'll remove it.

i noticed this by inspection after someone had some code that (correctly)
didn't compile with bionic or glibc but did with musl. in addition to
rejecting the proposal to add a rv64 SA_RESTORER to bionic, i said i'd
reach out to musl about removing it there :-)

> Rich

Content of type "text/html" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.