Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 04:44:47 +0200 From: Markus Wichmann <nullplan@....net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Revisiting LFS64 removal On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 07:07:08PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > As an alternative, maybe we should consider leaving these but only > under explict _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE rather than implicitly via > _GNU_SOURCE for at least one release cycle. This would allow makeshift > fixing of any builds that break by just adding -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > until a proper fix can be applied. > > Any preference here? > > Rich Given that nothing lasts as long as a temporary measure, I'd say it is better to rip the band-aid off in one go rather than two. Besides, any breakage ought to be able to be dealt with by a simple replacement, right? Ciao, Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.