[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 19:26:58 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: Markus Wichmann <nullplan@....net>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: IPv4 fallback in __res_msend_rc not functional
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 09:03:49PM +0200, Markus Wichmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed something while reading some code: There is a fallback in
> __res_msend_rc(), in case an IPv6 socket is requested but cannot be
> allocated. In that case, the function tries to create an IPv4 socket
> instead. However, I do not think this code can work that way. For
> reference, this is the code:
>
> /* Get local address and open/bind a socket */
> sa.sin.sin_family = family;
> fd = socket(family, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC|SOCK_NONBLOCK, 0);
>
> /* Handle case where system lacks IPv6 support */
> if (fd < 0 && family == AF_INET6 && errno == EAFNOSUPPORT) {
> fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC|SOCK_NONBLOCK, 0);
> family = AF_INET;
> }
> if (fd < 0 || bind(fd, (void *)&sa, sl) < 0) {
> if (fd >= 0) close(fd);
> pthread_setcancelstate(cs, 0);
> return -1;
> }
>
> The problem is, if the fallback is triggered, the local address is still
> set to be an IPv6 address, and so the bind() must necessarily fail with
> EINVAL.
>
> The fix depends on whether the fallback is still intended functionality
> or not. If not, then the easiest would be to just get rid of the entire
> fallback block. If the fallback is still intended to work, then the
> fallback block must reset sl to the length of an IPv4 socket, and the
> setting of sa.sin.sin_family must be delayed until after that block.
>
> There is also the issue of the sendto() loop further down in the
> function. If it is intended that the socket can be an IPv4 socket but
> there can be IPv6 addresses in the list, then it might be prudent to
> prevent sendto() from sending to the wrong address family. Or not, I
> mean, you do not test for errors from sendto(), and the sends to the
> wrong address family are just going to fail. So they would only waste
> time and change errno, but not much of a visible side effect.
Thanks for reporting this! It's intended to be functional, but it's
probably of little consequence whether it works since the issue seems
to arise only when resolv.conf requested IPv6 nameservers but the
system doesn't support IPv6. I'll look at what it'll take to fix it...
hopefully it won't be too bad.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
