[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YoXFGwbFzvBsaaJl@antec>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 13:18:35 +0900
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com, dalias@...c.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Define user_regs, elf_greg_t and elf_fpregset_t for
or1k
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 02:58:26PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> The OpenRISC architecture is currently missing a definition of its
> user_regs structure, elf_greg_t and elf_fpregset_t as well as ELF_NGREG,
> add those.
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>
> - Follow Stafford's recommendations based upon glibc
>
> arch/or1k/bits/user.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/or1k/bits/user.h b/arch/or1k/bits/user.h
> index e69de29bb2d1..227f022e2fec 100644
> --- a/arch/or1k/bits/user.h
> +++ b/arch/or1k/bits/user.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +struct user_regs {
> + unsigned long gpr[32];
> + unsigned long pc;
> + unsigned long sr;
> +};
> +
> +#define ELF_NGREG 32
> +typedef unsigned long elf_greg_t, elf_gregset_t[ELF_NGREG];
> +
I think ELF_NGREG should be 34 here.
On glibc we defined this like this, but I am beginning to doubt it is correct:
(sys/ucontext.h)
#define __NGREG 32
(bits/procfs.h)
#define ELF_NGREG __NGREG
typedef elf_greg_t elf_gregset_t[34];
In linux and some other architectures they define ELF_NGREG as below (so that
would mean 34 is right):
#define ELF_NGREG (sizeof (struct user_regs_struct) / sizeof (elf_greg_t))
In linux we define this, so yours matches.
(arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h)
truct user_regs_struct {
/* GPR R0-R31... */
unsigned long gpr[32];
unsigned long pc;
unsigned long sr;
};
> +typedef elf_greg_t elf_fpregset_t[ELF_NGREG];
This should be:
typedef elf_greg_t elf_fpregset_t[32];
However, I have tested all of glibc with the definition as above with ELF_NGREG
32 and elf_gregset_t[34]. But, I think I will like to change that and test
again.
So in the end I think we should use this.
#define ELF_NGREG (sizeof (struct user_regs) / sizeof (elf_greg_t))
typedef elf_greg_t elf_gregset_t[ELF_NGREG];
typedef elf_greg_t elf_fpregset_t[32];
Side Point
I am not sure why cpulimit needs elf_gregset_t anyway. I see it includes
procfs.h, I removed that include and it seems to compile ok.
-Stafford
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
