Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:16:45 -0700 From: Parke <parke.nexus@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Newbie problem with musl-gcc Nat! wrote: > > > musl-gcc -o foo foo.c > Am 08.10.21 um 08:31 schrieb Markus Wichmann: > > This doesn't say -static in there. Try adding that and see was happens. On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:01 PM Nat! <nat@...le-kybernetik.com> wrote: > Nice, now it works. > > musl-gcc essentially just adds a different specs file to GCC, and that > > file is not changed based on the choice to have the shared library or > > not. > But why not ? It would make sense, wouldn't it ? I believe the desired default, even with musl, is to use dynamic libraries. So, IMO, the current behavior is expected and desired.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.