[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93626619AB0D496E90CFA1DDAF9915FE@H270>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 18:31:12 +0200
From: "Stefan Kanthak" <stefan.kanthak@...go.de>
To: "Rich Felker" <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Changes for strcspn(), strspn(), strtok() and strtok_r()
Rich Felker wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 02:02:06PM +0200, Stefan Kanthak wrote:
>> #include <string.h>
>>
>> char *strtok_r(char *restrict s, const char *restrict sep, char **restrict p)
>> {
>> if (!s && !(s = *p)) return NULL;
>> s += strspn(s, sep);
>> - if (!*s) return *p = 0;
>> + if (!*s) return *p = NULL;
>> *p = s + strcspn(s, sep);
>> if (**p) *(*p)++ = 0;
>> - else *p = 0;
>> + else *p = NULL;
>> return s;
>> }
>
> This is a gratuitous style change in the opposite direction of what's
> preferred in musl.
Do you REALLY prefer using NULL and 0 in parallel for the null pointer?
Stefan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
