[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 17:20:44 +1000
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, Joakim Tjernlund
<Joakim.Tjernlund@...inera.com>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
musl@...ts.openwall.com, Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: Linux powerpc new system call instruction and ABI
Excerpts from Dmitry V. Levin's message of May 20, 2021 12:59 pm:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:45:57PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Excerpts from Dmitry V. Levin's message of May 20, 2021 11:06 am:
>> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 07:48:47PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
>> >> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 06:09:25PM +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> > W.r.t breaking ABI, isn't that what PowerPC is trying to do with the new syscall I/F?
>> >>
>> >> No, it's a new independent interface.
>> >
>> > Unfortunately, being a new independent interface doesn't mean it isn't
>> > an ABI break. In fact, it was a severe ABI break, and this thread is
>> > an attempt to find a hotfix.
>>
>> It is an ABI break, that was known. The ptrace info stuff I fixed with
>> the patch earlier was obviously a bug in my initial implementation and
>> not intended (sorry my ptrace testing was not sufficient, and thanks for
>> reporting it, by the way).
>
> Could you check whether tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/get_syscall_info.c
> passes again with your fix, please?
It does.
Thanks,
Nick
> If yes, then PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO is fixed.
>
> By the way, kernel tracing and audit subsystems also use those functions
> from asm/syscall.h and asm/ptrace.h, so your ptrace fix is likely to fix
> these subsystems as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
