Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 19:19:01 +0800 (GMT+08:00) From: 翟小娟 <zhaixiaojuan@...ngson.cn> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: 陈国祺 <chenguoqi@...ngson.cn> Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Port the new architecture loongarch64 to musl The reason for the implementation in assembly is because I am familiar with assembly myself. I think this shows the implementation logic and final purpose of the function more clearly than the implementation in C language. > -----原始邮件----- > 发件人: "Ariadne Conill" <ariadne@...eferenced.org> > 发送时间: 2021-05-13 03:53:01 (星期四) > 收件人: musl@...ts.openwall.com > 抄送: "陈国祺" <chenguoqi@...ngson.cn> > 主题: Re: Re: Re: [musl] Port the new architecture loongarch64 to musl > > Hi, > > On Wed, 12 May 2021, 翟小娟 wrote: > > > Hi, > > We have ported the code of libucontext for loongarch64 architecture and can be obtained from https://github.com/loongson-community/libucontext > > Currently qemu is still being tested, I will announce it as soon as it is completed. > > It looks alright, but I am wondering why makecontext is written in > assembly. The reason why it is written in assembly for mips had to do > with specific peculariaties of how the MIPS64 ABI interacted with > libucontext. I don't see that the loongarch64 code is trying to capture > the $gp register though. > > Ariadne </chenguoqi@...ngson.cn></ariadne@...eferenced.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.