[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:29:48 +0200
From: ardi <ardillasdelmonte@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Linux distribution for using RISC-V musl?
Ataraxia looks really interesting: LLVM+musl+Toybox is the kind of
distribution I’d love to have. Is there any page explaining how to install
Ataraxia on RISCV? The docs only cover x86 and PPC, and besides the latest
RISCV release I found is from 2019 or so...
Also, regarding LLVM LTO, what’s the ticket for following that bug? I
searched for it and all what I found is.
Thanks!!
Nagakamira <nagakamira@...il.com> wrote:
> Try ataraxia gnu/linux! But llvm lto have to be fixed.
>
> вс, 11 апр. 2021 г., 00:17 ardi <ardillasdelmonte@...il.com>:
>
>> Really useful!! Thanks a lot!
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 2:24 PM Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > * ardi <ardillasdelmonte@...il.com> [2021-04-10 14:08:31 +0200]:
>> > > Also, I've read that QEMU is able to emulate multicore RISC-V CPUs.
>> > > Does musl support multicore RISC-V in 64bit? I mean, if I configure a
>> > > multicore RISC-V in QEMU and I try to build a parallel loop using
>> > > OpenMP for example, will such loop be parallelized if I'm using musl?
>> >
>> > yes.
>> >
>> > this has not much to do with the libc though.
>> > openmp uses pthreads, pthreads uses clone and
>> > clone is implemented by the os in some way.
>> > whether things are parallel is not in the hands
>> > of the libc and the logic is not target dependent,
>> > the libc works the same way on x86_64 as on riscv.
>> > there can be target specific synchronization bugs
>> > in the libc, but those are just bugs.
>> >
>>
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
