[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 18:11:51 -0800
From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crt: Add .file directive
Thanks for update thats right way to go as well. I think we can ignore
this patch
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 12:08 PM Fangrui Song <i@...kray.me> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 1:54 PM Fangrui Song <i@...kray.me> wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-10-30, Rich Felker wrote:
> > >On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:44:02AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > >> Musl linked binaries come out to be not reproducible because
> > >> absolute build path is seen in debug info of crti.o and crtn.o
> > >> This is due to the fact that these objects are built from assembly
> > >> source files and they are missing .file directive
> > >> if we add .file <filename>.s in them then debug info encodes this
> > >> value instead of absolute path in debug_line section
> >
> > .debug_line is unrelated because there is no .loc directive in these
> > crti.s and crtn.s files.
> >
> > Many architectures do not leave non-STT_SECTION STB_LOCAL symbols in
> > crti.o and crtn.o, so they don't need to be patched (even if the
> > maintainer agrees to add the workaround in musl, instead of fixing the
> > toolchain).
> >
> > >Surely there should be some better way to achieve this with CFLAGS
> > >instead of duplication across every source file..?
> > >
> > >Rich
> >
> > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48023 captures the nature of the
> > problem. You may send a message to binutils@...rceware.org how GCC/gas
> > should handle this situation.
> >
> > LLD and gold do not synthesize STT_FILE, hence no such problem.
>
> The binutils action is: GNU ld 2.36 will use the base name
> (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26822)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
