[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 09:04:27 -0800
From: Fangrui Song <i@...kray.me>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: anarchy@...too.org
Subject: Re: sanitizers and musl
On 2020-12-29, Dmitry Golovin wrote:
>29.12.2020, 10:37, "Ray" <emacsray@...il.com>:
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:44 PM Dmitry Golovin <dima@...ovin.in> wrote:
>>> 29.12.2020, 08:15, "Fangrui Song" <i@...kray.me>:
>>> > With https://reviews.llvm.org/D93848 (and various random fixes I pushed
>>> > separately), many sanitizers will build and work on a musl based distribution.
>>> > A maintainer said the patch is in a pretty good shape and is very likely
>>> > accepted.
>>>
>>> Hi Fangrui,
>>>
>>> Did I understand correctly that your patches this one is rendered useless?
>>>
>>> https://github.com/tpimh/ngtc/blob/docker/root/patch/compiler-rt-01-sanitizer-nongnu.patch
>>>
>>> If your changes make it to LLVM 12, patching for musl won't be necessary anymore?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dima
>>
>> Thanks for the link! I was not aware of the other attempts. I'll check
>> whether your patch includes anything I'm missing.
>>
>> (My patch hasn't sorted out the ioctl issues.)
>
>Hi Ray,
>
>I'm not quite sure now who is the original author of this patch. Maybe Jory Pratt?
>
>Anyway I was updating the patch for recent LLVM releases, most up-to-date code should be in version-11.0.0 branch.
>
>Regards,
>Dima
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93848 will be available in the upcoming LLVM 12.0.0.
I have figured out and fixed the CMake libc++ problem.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
