Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 09:04:27 -0800 From: Fangrui Song <i@...kray.me> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: anarchy@...too.org Subject: Re: sanitizers and musl On 2020-12-29, Dmitry Golovin wrote: >29.12.2020, 10:37, "Ray" <emacsray@...il.com>: >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:44 PM Dmitry Golovin <dima@...ovin.in> wrote: >>> 29.12.2020, 08:15, "Fangrui Song" <i@...kray.me>: >>> > With https://reviews.llvm.org/D93848 (and various random fixes I pushed >>> > separately), many sanitizers will build and work on a musl based distribution. >>> > A maintainer said the patch is in a pretty good shape and is very likely >>> > accepted. >>> >>> Hi Fangrui, >>> >>> Did I understand correctly that your patches this one is rendered useless? >>> >>> https://github.com/tpimh/ngtc/blob/docker/root/patch/compiler-rt-01-sanitizer-nongnu.patch >>> >>> If your changes make it to LLVM 12, patching for musl won't be necessary anymore? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Dima >> >> Thanks for the link! I was not aware of the other attempts. I'll check >> whether your patch includes anything I'm missing. >> >> (My patch hasn't sorted out the ioctl issues.) > >Hi Ray, > >I'm not quite sure now who is the original author of this patch. Maybe Jory Pratt? > >Anyway I was updating the patch for recent LLVM releases, most up-to-date code should be in version-11.0.0 branch. > >Regards, >Dima https://reviews.llvm.org/D93848 will be available in the upcoming LLVM 12.0.0. I have figured out and fixed the CMake libc++ problem.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.