[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:05:06 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: Alexey Izbyshev <izbyshev@...ras.ru>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Why is setrlimit() considered to have per-thread effect?
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 06:50:41PM +0300, Alexey Izbyshev wrote:
> >>Tangentially, setgroups() is not called via __synccall(), though
> >>it does
> >>have per-thread effect. Is this intentional?
> >
> >that may be a bug, but it's not a posix api
> >so not a conformance issue, but a linux issue:
> >if other linux libcs don't do synccall then
> >that's the defacto interface contract.
> >
> FWIW, glibc does synccall since 2011:
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=70181fddf14
Thanks, looks like we should do the same here.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
