Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:05:06 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: Alexey Izbyshev <izbyshev@...ras.ru> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Why is setrlimit() considered to have per-thread effect? On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 06:50:41PM +0300, Alexey Izbyshev wrote: > >>Tangentially, setgroups() is not called via __synccall(), though > >>it does > >>have per-thread effect. Is this intentional? > > > >that may be a bug, but it's not a posix api > >so not a conformance issue, but a linux issue: > >if other linux libcs don't do synccall then > >that's the defacto interface contract. > > > FWIW, glibc does synccall since 2011: > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=70181fddf14 Thanks, looks like we should do the same here. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.