Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 15:37:25 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: ell1e <kittens@...ble.ninja> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Would it to be possible to get strtoll_l? On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 03:44:11PM +0200, ell1e wrote: > Hi Rich, > > I admit I have a very biased view. Let me first preface this with saying > that for my program, this issue is now solved. However, I think there > might be some use if I explain further where I am coming from, and what > I think about adding more *_l() functions: > > This is how I came to here, asking about strtoll_l(): > > [...] > > I don't think I can give you further insight than this. Nevertheless, I > hope that wall of text had something of use for you. Really all I'm looking for is some investigation into what the set of potentially-wanted extended *_l functions that other implementations have looks like -- whether you think you/users would want all of those or some clearly-scoped subset of them that makes sense -- rather than just asking for one random function at a time with no clear idea of where that will go. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.