[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 15:37:25 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: ell1e <kittens@...ble.ninja>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Would it to be possible to get strtoll_l?
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 03:44:11PM +0200, ell1e wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> I admit I have a very biased view. Let me first preface this with saying
> that for my program, this issue is now solved. However, I think there
> might be some use if I explain further where I am coming from, and what
> I think about adding more *_l() functions:
>
> This is how I came to here, asking about strtoll_l():
>
> [...]
>
> I don't think I can give you further insight than this. Nevertheless, I
> hope that wall of text had something of use for you.
Really all I'm looking for is some investigation into what the set of
potentially-wanted extended *_l functions that other implementations
have looks like -- whether you think you/users would want all of those
or some clearly-scoped subset of them that makes sense -- rather than
just asking for one random function at a time with no clear idea of
where that will go.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
