Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:35:29 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: ell1e <kittens@...ble.ninja> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Would it to be possible to get strtoll_l? On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 02:34:47AM +0200, ell1e wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm working on a project and since the global state setlocale() seems to > be a bit of a mess to rely on, I'm using the *_l() string functions > instead. However, musl libc appears to lack strtoll_l() right now, so > I'm wondering if that'll be added any time soon? The portable way to do this is just calling uselocale() rather than passing the locale_t to individual *_l functions. You can even implement a fallback strtoll_l as: localt_t old = uselocale(l); result = strtoll(a,b,c); uselocale(old); It's slightly more efficient if you keep the uselocale across multiple calls, but not that big a deal; uselocale is an extremely light operation. But is there a reason you don't just want plain strtoll? C allows that "additional locale-specific subject sequence forms may be accepted" in locales other than the C locale, but does not permit standard sequences to be interpreted differently, and in practice I'm not aware of implementations that do anything funny here. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.