Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 23:51:52 +0200 From: Daniel Neri <dne+musl@...7.eu> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Incompatible behaviour of res_query(3) w.r.t. NXDOMAIN On 24 Aug 2020, at 23:32, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote: > > Does such a distinction exist? I thought res_query was just equivalent > to res_mkquery+res_send and that calling res_send directly would get > you the same errors. I thought so too, but I’ve been reading the musl implementation. ;-) After looking more at the other implementations, I think Florian is correct though: it’s more like res_mkquery+res_send+setting h_errno and the return value based on the RCODE of the response. Regards, Daniel Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.