Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:53:58 +0300 (MSK) From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@...ras.ru> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] setjmp: fix x86-64 longjmp argument adjustment On Thu, 13 Aug 2020, Jens Gustedt wrote: > Alexander, > probably this has nothing to do with the issue at hand but > > on Wed, 12 Aug 2020 16:29:59 +0300 (MSK) you (Alexander Monakov > <amonakov@...ras.ru>) wrote: > > > int v = setjmp(jb); > > is a use of `setjmp` that is not conforming. `setjmp` is only allowed > either standalone or as controlling expression either directly or > negated. Thanks. Yeah, this is a moot point as the test needs GCC with -O anyway, and GCC allows setjmp in any context. But nevertheless it's easy to adjust it by changing the offending line to 'if (setjmp(jb)) return 0;' and changing the final 'return !v' to 'return 1'. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.