Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 13:00:54 +0000 From: Robert Skopalík <rs@...ome.cz> To: "musl@...ts.openwall.com" <musl@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: RE: strtok Me tooo :))) -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Oppenlander [mailto:patrick.oppenlander@...il.com] Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2020 9:07 AM To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [musl] strtok On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 10:15 AM Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote: > > If multiple programs are running, each needs its own execution context > including its own versions of all libc (and any other) global data. > Probably you should look into the ARM FDPIC ABI, which is the right > way to do this while still sharing program text for MMU-less > microcontrollers like the one you're working with. The tooling should > be mature now so that support could be added to musl, but making it > happen needs people who are interested in providing feedback and > testing. > I'm very interested and will definitely be able to provide feedback & testing. Apex (apexrtos.com) is waiting for musl FDPIC support so that I can work on the kernel side. This is the RTOS with the Linux syscall interface I think I might have mentioned some time ago. Patrick
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.