Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:18:44 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org> Cc: Daniel Kolesa <daniel@...aforge.org>, Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>, Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>, libc-alpha@...rceware.org, eery@...erfox.es, musl@...ts.openwall.com, Will Springer <skirmisher@...tonmail.com>, Palmer Dabbelt via binutils <binutils@...rceware.org>, via libc-dev <libc-dev@...ts.llvm.org>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Re: ppc64le and 32-bit LE userland compatibility On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 12:12:32PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 05:13:25PM +0200, Daniel Kolesa wrote: > > well, ppc64le already cannot be run on those, as far as I know (I > > don't think it's possible to build ppc64le userland without VSX in > > any configuration) > > VSX is required by the ELFv2 ABI: > > """ > Specifically, to use this ABI and ABI-compliant programs, OpenPOWER- > compliant processors must implement the following categories: This is not actually ABI but IBM policy laundered into an ABI document, which musl does not honor. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.