[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 15:21:03 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: enh <enh@...gle.com>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: remove SIGSTKFLT on mips?
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:51:29AM -0700, enh wrote:
> (context: https://github.com/landley/toybox/issues/194)
>
> seems like musl defines SIGSTKFLT for mips as signal 7. the kernel
> disagrees and says SIGEMT is 7, and that mips doesn't have a
> SIGSTKFLT:
>
> arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/signal.h:#define SIGEMT 7
>
> git blame says SIGSTKFLT was introduced in the original commit:
>
> commit 6315004f6102dca44c4ba50654a36967b8b9c2a6
> Author: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
> Date: Wed Jul 11 04:22:13 2012 -0400
>
> initial version of mips (o32) port, based on work by Richard
> Pennington (rdp)
>
> basically, this version of the code was obtained by starting with
> rdp's work from his ellcc source tree, adapting it to musl's build
> system and coding style, auditing the bits headers for discrepencies
> with kernel definitions or glibc/LSB ABI or large file issues, fixing
> up incompatibility with the old binutils from aboriginal linux, and
> adding some new special cases to deal with the oddities of sigaction
> and pipe syscall interfaces on mips.
>
> at present, minimal test programs work, but some interfaces are broken
> or missing. threaded programs probably will not link.
I have the two attached patches pending push if there's no objection.
Rich
View attachment "0001-handle-possibility-that-SIGEMT-replaces-SIGSTKFLT-in.patch" of type "text/plain" (1109 bytes)
View attachment "0002-fix-incorrect-SIGSTKFLT-on-all-mips-archs.patch" of type "text/plain" (1703 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
