Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 16:41:31 +1100 (AEDT)
From: Damian McGuckin <>
Subject: Re: Considering x86-64 fenv.s to C

On Sat, 22 Feb 2020, Rich Felker wrote:

> First comment: I couldn't find (maybe I missed?) what you intend fore
> the contents of fenv-generic.c and fenv-trivial.c to be, but I don't
> see what you want them for. fenv.c should just use the macros/inlines
> the fenv_arch.h defines, naturally collapsing to empty functions when
> they do nothing (for softfloat archs).

I agree. I was seduced by what I thought was a better way.

I assume that I can also have a


Each of thes is pulled in at the end of fenv_arch.h for respectively

a)	those machines with a generic soft_float architecture

b)	those machines with non-Intel (hard) FPUs.

Regards - Damian

Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037
Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here
Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.