Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 16:41:31 +1100 (AEDT) From: Damian McGuckin <damianm@....com.au> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Considering x86-64 fenv.s to C On Sat, 22 Feb 2020, Rich Felker wrote: > First comment: I couldn't find (maybe I missed?) what you intend fore > the contents of fenv-generic.c and fenv-trivial.c to be, but I don't > see what you want them for. fenv.c should just use the macros/inlines > the fenv_arch.h defines, naturally collapsing to empty functions when > they do nothing (for softfloat archs). I agree. I was seduced by what I thought was a better way. I assume that I can also have a fenv_arch_soft_float.h and fenv_arch_common_fpu.h Each of thes is pulled in at the end of fenv_arch.h for respectively a) those machines with a generic soft_float architecture b) those machines with non-Intel (hard) FPUs. Regards - Damian Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037 Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.