Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 18:45:11 +0100 From: Milan P. Stanić <mps@...anta.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: Musl gentoo development: browsers On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 12:29, Rich Felker wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 03:20:08PM +0100, Brian Peregrine wrote: > > I probably need to clarify the approach further. > > The idea is to have something (more precisely a script) which is > > intented specifically for gentoo (not all linux variants; not that the > > pull is to the gentoo/musl repo btw). Once that's ready, a binary can > > be made. Speaking for our own distro, it can be used on the optional > > usb stick (https://github.com/Sharrisii/TAZ_optional_usb_stick/tree/master/binaries > > ). I assume these binaries can then also be shared and used with > > non-gentoo based linux versions (if generic compiler flags are used, > > which is also the idea). > > > > Interested people can work on improving the files in the pull > > (https://github.com/gentoo/musl/pull/296 ) and then having these > > improvements added to the pull. > > > > Adelie's firefox-esr version is 68.5.0, jakeogh's version (in pull) is > > v.41 so Adelie's version is indeed newer. Current is v73, so still > > needs to be improved it further. So yes, you could already switch this > > in the pull. > > The binary I used of Adelie (v52.9.0-r4, back in June 2019) didn't > > work, and wasn't optimized for i686 cpu's (and also, Adelie linux is > > based on abuild system rather then gentoo's portage system), so I am > > somewhat cautious. That said, if the script is worked out further, > > there may be no issues. > > AIUI Adélie follows -esr for which 68 is latest; is that incorrect? > Alpine has 73 in the testing repo. Alpine have both -esr in community and latest release (73.0) in testing. Though doesn't work on all architectures. > Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.