Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:46:08 +1100 (AEDT) From: Damian McGuckin <damianm@....com.au> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com cc: mg1633068 <songyue@...il.nju.edu.cn> Subject: Re: casinh function accuracy problem On Tue, 11 Feb 2020, Rich Felker wrote: > High-quality complex math functions are a long-term wishlist item for > musl but nobody has stepped up to do them and I don't really feel like > doing it, at least not over other improvements I could be working on. As you say, they do work reasonably well even now. With even complex arithmetic being "unspecified" in IEEE-754-2019, it is an interesting issue where "interesting" does not have the conventional English sense of being a positive thing. > This might be an area well-served by sponsored enhancement if there's > a user who needs them improved with resources to pay someone to do it. Depending on your definition of "improved", it is anything from a big task to a huge task. And sadly, I have other things on my plate too. Mc 2c - Damian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.