Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 17:06:11 -0600 From: "A. Wilcox" <awilfox@...lielinux.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] add support for pthread_sigqueue On 05/02/2020 13:27, Rich Felker wrote: > Is the naming pthread_sigqueue (vs pthread_sigqueue_np) intentional? > Normally pthread functions that are not part of the standard are > introduced as _np (non-portable) and promoted later if accepted as > standards since the pthread_* namespace is reserved for future > directions of the standard. Does glibc have this function with the > same signature already? The signature differs only with the constness of the third argument in the header. (The constness in the function implementation is correct.) It is implemented not only in glibc, but additionally in Solaris 11: https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E88353_01/html/E37843/pthread-sigqueue-3c.html The corresponding system call was added in Linux 2.6.31, if it matters. I have no comments (positive or negative) regarding the addition of this call nor its implementation other than that the constness should be fixed in the header. Best, --arw -- A. Wilcox (awilfox) Project Lead, Adélie Linux https://www.adelielinux.org Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.