Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 11:02:44 -0500 From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: PPC64(LE) support in musl requires ALTIVEC On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 10:43 AM Romain Naour <romain.naour@...il.com> wrote: > > Le 03/02/2020 à 15:50, Rich Felker a écrit : > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 03:16:17PM +0100, Romain Naour wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> We noticed that musl toolchain doesn't work on PPC64 e5500 cpus due to > >> Altived instructions in src/setjmp/powerpc64/setjmp.s . > >> > >> A patch has been sent by Vincent Fazio to the Buildroot mailing list to disable > >> musl for such cpus . > >> > >> Maybe the supported-platforms list could be updated . > >> > >>  https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/setjmp/powerpc64/setjmp.s#n74 > >>  http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1231986/ > >>  https://wiki.musl-libc.org/supported-platforms.html > > > > Is this like the 32-bit Freescale things with the weird alternate FPU? > > Indeed, it seems that the only one ppc64 cpu without Altivec support. I'm not sure if it matters or how it relates here, but I believe IBM compilers (XL C and XL C++) do not allow Altivec until Power5. I think the decision was more policies and procedures, though. Power5 was the first ABI specification from the OpenPower group. Other compilers supported Altivec earlier then Power5. For example, Apple's GCC supported Altivec at least as early as Power3. And I have a PowerMac that is Power4 and Altivec works fine. Jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.