Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 11:47:38 +1100 (AEDT) From: Damian McGuckin <damianm@....com.au> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Considering x86-64 fenv.s to C Questions of style: When working inside 'fenv.c', what should internal routines and definition be called to avoid namespace pollution, retain clarity, and so on. Note that 'fenv.c' is designed to never call any routines external to itself. Do we keep using FE_<SOMETHING> and fe<SOMETHING> where <SOMETHING> is some meaningful name, to conform to the external interface which we assume will never clash. Or do we use __<SOMETHING> as is used or __flt_rounds which is used by FTL_ROUNDS when recovering the current IEEE 754 rounding style, as opposed to the architecture dependent one. Thanks - Damian Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037 Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.