Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 23:27:09 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [RFC] removing SYS_clock_gettime & SYS_gettimeofday On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 06:09:08PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Rich Felker: > > > I think I'd like to go ahead with this patch, discussed in a previous > > thread. Does it look okay? Should I add any other syscalls that are > > absolutely not valid to use anymore (as opposed to the ones with > > optional timeouts, which I won't remove, because musl doesn't break > > valid code to catch bugs) to the list? > > I think this change needs to be reflected in the UAPI headers in some > way, too. Can you clarify? Do you mean asm/unistd.h? musl does not use it to provide sys/syscall.h. I suppose it's possible that some applications are including asm/unistd.h rather than sys/syscall.h (is there a code search that could check this for us?) but my experience has been that they use the latter, and I don't think there's much we can do about the former, at least not from our side. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.