[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 16:08:26 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: 39236@...bugs.gnu.org, musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: coreutils cp mishandles error return from lchmod
* Rich Felker:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 03:34:18PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Rich Felker:
>>
>> > coreutils should be opting to use the system-provided lchmod, which is
>> > safe, and correctly handling error returns (silently treating
>> > EOPNOTSUPP as success) rather than as hard errors.
>>
>> glibc's lchmod always returns ENOSYS (except on Hurd). I don't know how
>> lchmod is used in coreutils, but I suspect it is not particularly
>> useful.
>
> When preserving permissions (cp -p, archive extraction, etc.), you
> want lchmod to work correctly just for the purpose of *not* following
> the link and thereby unwantedly changing the permissions of the link
> target. But, fchmodat with AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW works just as well and
> is standard, and that's really what coreutils should be using.
I think you misread what I wrote: lchmod *always* returns ENOSYS. Even
if the file is not a symbolic link. Likewise, fchmodat with
AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW *always* returns ENOTSUP.
The reason for this is that the kernel does not provide a suitable
system call to implement this, even though some file systems allow a
mode change for symbolic links. I think we can do better, although I
should note that each time we implement such emulation in userspace, it
comes back to bite us eventually.
Thanks,
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
