[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2019 19:49:29 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dalias@...c.org
Cc: AWilcox@...cox-Tech.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] uapi: Prevent redefinition of struct iphdr
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2019 20:05:15 -0500
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 04:34:11PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> I find it really strange that this, therefore, only happens for musl
>> and we haven't had thousands of reports of this conflict with glibc
>> over the years.
>
> It's possible that there's software that's including just one of the
> headers conditional on __GLIBC__, and including both otherwise, or
> something like that. Arguably this should be considered unsupported
> usage; there are plenty of headers where that doesn't work and
> shouldn't be expected to.
I don't buy that, this is waaaaaay too common a header to use.
Please investigate.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
