Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 09:14:11 +1100 (AEDT) From: Damian McGuckin <damianm@....com.au> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com cc: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fmax(), fmaxf(), fmaxl(), fmin(), fminf(), fminl() simplified On Wed, 11 Dec 2019, Stefan Kanthak wrote: > This is better than my proposed change, as it also avoids the side- > effect of (x != x) which can raise exceptions, and gets rid of the > explicit transfer to integer registers, which can hurt performance. I thought that x != x should NOT raise an exception, at least as I read Kahan's lecture notes. Regards - Damian Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037 Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.