Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 13:03:05 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: avoid conditional branch to PLT in sigsetjmp.s On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:54:41PM -0800, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 12:54 PM Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:52:13AM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 7:29 AM Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 11:04 PM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@...il.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The R_ARM_THM_JUMP19 relocation type generated for the original code > > > > > when targeting Thumb 2 is not supported by the gold linker: > > > > > > > > > > | .../arm-oe-linux-musleabi/9.2.0/ld: error: conditional branch to PLT in THUMB-2 not supported yet. > > > > > | src/signal/arm/sigsetjmp.s:9: error: unexpected opcode while processing relocation R_ARM_THM_JUMP19 > > > > > > > > if it is thumb2 specific another option could be to use `it eq` before > > > > beq which should turn branch into an unconditional branch, which then > > > > uses R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 relocation that has a range of 16MB. > > > > > > That would work too. Thumb 2 specific code would need to be guarded by > > > #ifdef __thumb2__ though (which I think implies also renaming the file > > > from .s to .S ?) and I'm not sure if the extra complexity justifies > > > saving one instruction in the ARM case. > > > > I don't think it does. Also, current style is not to use "it" at all, > > but rather -Wa,-mimplicit-it=always. I'm not sure if unified syntax > > accepts "it" in arm mode when the following insn has a matching > > condition suffix, but here it wouldn't I think... > > Any issues with merging this now? Looks fine. Applying. Sorry I overlooked this. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.