Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:12:12 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Use open_memstream(3) for more efficient asprintf On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 02:56:36AM -0400, Alex Brachet-Mialot wrote: > That's strange, I looked on the archives and it looks like my > attachment was in a weird format, something my email client did > perhaps. Here it is copied I'll also try again with .txt extension so > my mail client is less confused hopefully. Sorry about that. It came through ok -- the attachment was just marked as a binary file rather than text. If your mailer can send text attachments without mangling the content, it's preferable to send as text so that archive/recipients' mail software will show them, but either is okay and binary (application/octet-streaam) can be better if you're at all worried that your mailer will mess things up, e.g. replacing tabs with spaces. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.