|
|
Message-ID: <CA+jjjYQTJakriFpM4mc9BOLFX8j3E8p7kqWhy1P5Qwf_xV7GQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:41:32 -0700
From: Joshua Hudson <joshudson@...il.com>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: musl <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Re: posix_spawn
> > You now have a quirk and I need to actually detect musl libc.
> Huh? This does not sound musl-specific.
Musl seems to be the only library that actually implements vfork
shared memory that can't tolerate calling setuid() inside it.
This patch should take care of the issue.
diff --git a/src/thread/synccall.c b/src/thread/synccall.c
index 648a6ad4..e152ccfe 100644
--- a/src/thread/synccall.c
+++ b/src/thread/synccall.c
@@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ void __synccall(void (*func)(void *), void *ctx)
struct sigaction sa = { .sa_flags = SA_RESTART, .sa_handler = handler };
pthread_t self = __pthread_self(), td;
int count = 0;
+ /* If we aren't in the process we think we're in, this is the best we
+ * can hope for. */
+ if (__pthread_self()->tid != syscall(SYS_gettid)) goto single_threaded;
/* Blocking signals in two steps, first only app-level signals
* before taking the lock, then all signals after taking the lock,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.