[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 20:47:29 +0300
From: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com,
Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
Subject: [PATCH v2] remove riscv64 user_regs_struct
user_regs_struct removal fixes possible conflict with the kernel
definition of the same struct in asm/ptrace.h. glibc does not define
user_regs_struct for riscv either.
---
v2: Remove user_regs_struct entirely following feedback from Rich and
Szabolcs
---
arch/riscv64/bits/user.h | 35 -----------------------------------
1 file changed, 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h b/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h
index bd0f0fc7027f..d2e383b24e53 100644
--- a/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h
+++ b/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h
@@ -1,38 +1,3 @@
-struct user_regs_struct {
- unsigned long pc;
- unsigned long ra;
- unsigned long sp;
- unsigned long gp;
- unsigned long tp;
- unsigned long t0;
- unsigned long t1;
- unsigned long t2;
- unsigned long s0;
- unsigned long s1;
- unsigned long a0;
- unsigned long a1;
- unsigned long a2;
- unsigned long a3;
- unsigned long a4;
- unsigned long a5;
- unsigned long a6;
- unsigned long a7;
- unsigned long s2;
- unsigned long s3;
- unsigned long s4;
- unsigned long s5;
- unsigned long s6;
- unsigned long s7;
- unsigned long s8;
- unsigned long s9;
- unsigned long s10;
- unsigned long s11;
- unsigned long t3;
- unsigned long t4;
- unsigned long t5;
- unsigned long t6;
-};
-
struct user_fpregs_struct {
double f[32];
unsigned int fcsr;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
