Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 20:31:11 +0000 From: Orivej Desh <orivej@....fr> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: sem_wait and EINTR * Markus Wichmann <nullplan@....net> [2018-12-06] > Hi all, > > is the attached patch acceptable? A word about the bitfields: I > generally dislike them for most things, but I didn't want to destroy the > alignment struct __libc had going on, and these other flags really only > are 0 or 1. > > Patch is untested for want of an old kernel. Thank you! I have checked that your patch works as intended. I have emulated an old kernel with this: --- a/src/thread/__timedwait.c +++ b/src/thread/__timedwait.c @@ -28 +28 @@ int __timedwait_cp(volatile int *addr, int val, - r = -__syscall_cp(SYS_futex, addr, FUTEX_WAIT|priv, val, top); + r = EINTR;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.