Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:27:00 -0400 From: Ed Maste <emaste@...ebsd.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: qsort_r or qsort_s in musl > qsort_r was at first rejected because of the conflicting definitions > -- existence of same-named interfaces with different semantics or > signatures is one of the big criteria for exclusion of nonstandard > extensions in musl. However, from the FreeBSD side at least there > seems to be interest in dropping their version and agreeing upon a > standard aligned with glibc's version, for the sake of POSIX: If you want to see the current state of this in FreeBSD, we have a code review in progress in Phabricator at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083. If POSIX standardizes on the glibc version I'm sure we'll follow.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.