[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 17:45:50 +0200
From: Leah Neukirchen <leah@...u.org>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@...hat.com>, musl@...ts.openwall.com, Balazs Kezes <rlblaster@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Re: qsort_r or qsort_s in musl
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> writes:
> Thanks. Final acceptance into POSIX isn't completely mandatory for us
> to adopt it, but I'd at least want to see that FreeBSD (others would
> be great too) is moving forward with converting over to the
> glibc/proposed-POSIX signature so the risk of this devolving into a
> deadlock is in the past.
AFAICS, macOS and DragonFlyBSD also use the FreeBSD signature.
OpenBSD never implemented qsort_r; NetBSD proposed to implemement the
glibc signature in 2013, but this didn't seem to be merged.
--
Leah Neukirchen <leah@...u.org> http://leah.zone
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
