[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:29:31 -0700
From: Fāng-ruì Sòng <emacsray@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: clang/musl/linux?
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 6:38 AM Dmitry Golovin <dima@...ovin.in> wrote:
> 07.08.2018, 16:19, "Jon Chesterfield" <jonathanchesterfield@...il.com>:
> > I'm interested in using a toolchain containing clang, musl and the llvm
> C++ stack from a glibc linux host. There is some patchy documentation on
> doing this which suggests it is possible with some relatively minor
> patches. Most of the links are from a few years ago.
> >
> > Does anyone on this list use a similar setup today? If so, does it work
> for you?
> >
> > Essentially I'm hoping for guidance on whether the end result of the
> cmake hackery would be stable enough to use as my daily toolchain, before
> grinding through the inevitable plumbing.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Jon
>
> Unfortunately, it's not possible to build mainline linux with clang right
> now. Currently most efforts on patching the kernel are combined in this
> repo: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux (it is also not ready to
> be compiled yet).
>
> You can also check my GNU-free toolchain as a starting point:
> https://github.com/tpimh/ngtc
> It uses musl, clang, lld and libcxx with very little patching.
>
> Regards,
> Dmitry
>
Has anyone tried building llvm+musl on regular glibc-based Linux
distributions (not Alpine, ...)? I would like to test (ninja check-all) if
I know the instructions.
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
