Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:29:31 -0700 From: Fāng-ruì Sòng <emacsray@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: clang/musl/linux? On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 6:38 AM Dmitry Golovin <dima@...ovin.in> wrote: > 07.08.2018, 16:19, "Jon Chesterfield" <jonathanchesterfield@...il.com>: > > I'm interested in using a toolchain containing clang, musl and the llvm > C++ stack from a glibc linux host. There is some patchy documentation on > doing this which suggests it is possible with some relatively minor > patches. Most of the links are from a few years ago. > > > > Does anyone on this list use a similar setup today? If so, does it work > for you? > > > > Essentially I'm hoping for guidance on whether the end result of the > cmake hackery would be stable enough to use as my daily toolchain, before > grinding through the inevitable plumbing. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Jon > > Unfortunately, it's not possible to build mainline linux with clang right > now. Currently most efforts on patching the kernel are combined in this > repo: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux (it is also not ready to > be compiled yet). > > You can also check my GNU-free toolchain as a starting point: > https://github.com/tpimh/ngtc > It uses musl, clang, lld and libcxx with very little patching. > > Regards, > Dmitry > Has anyone tried building llvm+musl on regular glibc-based Linux distributions (not Alpine, ...)? I would like to test (ninja check-all) if I know the instructions. Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.